Here
is an article on data mining of drug prescriptions by Bill Mears, CNN Supreme
court producer.
Pharmacies are required under law to preserve a
doctor's prescription records, and although federal law protects a patient's
privacy, a physician does not receive similar protections. Drug makers have
been after profits hidden inside pharmacies for years, they are not after your name but
after the drug being offered. Because laws are getting passed that are
shrinking health care cost which is making it harder for companies to sell new
and innovated products. Yes, data mining is in pharmacies but not after
customers, but after the behaviors of doctors for writing the prescription, so
when it is time to market they know what to go sell. Firms like IMS Health say
their for-profit services benefit patients and doctors by making it possible to
track disease and monitor drug safety and effectiveness. Do you think this
benefits you?
Marketing of information on consumers' credit card
purchases, Internet use, financial investments and savings, and insurance
coverage may all be affected by what the high court decides for the first time
on the issue of data mining for commercial purposes. Even potentially
non-marketing uses, such as news reporting, scholarly research, and general publishing
could be subject to some form of government regulation. Even though people are
after all this information, is there really any possible way to make them stop?
And how would we even know if we are being monitored or not? If the drug makers
really feel that mining this information can be not only lucrative but can save
lives I say why stop them. The government wants is so that laws would only
prevent "further dissemination of the data except for health care research”
and this could also give the doctors a chance to turn away marketers and create
more privacy. But what if that marketer has a drug that has less side effects
and cost a lot less for the doctor and patient? Are we missing out in that way
or is our privacy more valuable to us?
"High
Court Hears Case over 'data Mining' of Drug Prescription Data." CNN.
N.p., 26 Apr. 2011. Web. 13 Mar. 2013.
Since it's been 2 years since this event in Vermont, is there an update?
ReplyDeleteHave other states been dealing with similar data mining tension over drug prescriptions?
I agree that it would be useful to track disease and monitor drug safety and effectiveness. So while the motives could have a monetary incentive, the long-term results could increase "communication" (in sorts) between the makers and users = better use of resources with overall better prognoses.
-Mary Alice